Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12367 (BOM)

ROHIT SAHEBRAO SHEGAR v. YES BANK LTD AND OTHERS

WP/106/2026 · 2026-09-23

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

941 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 106 OF 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 941 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 106 OF 2026 Rohit Sahebrao Shegar Versus Yes Bank Ltd. And Others __________________________________________________________ • Adv. Amol A. Pawar h/f. Adv. B. Shwetambari R. for the Petitioner • Mr. N. B. Patil, A.P.P. for State • Adv. Yadnik Bolkar h/f. Adv. Suresh W. Munde for Respondent No. 1 • Adv. Ms. Bharaswadkar Patil Kalpalata, Senior Standing Counsel for Respondent No. 5 - Income Tax Department __________________________________________________________ CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ. DATE : SEPTEMBER 23, 2026 PER COURT : 1) Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that though the petition was filed for defreezing the account of the petitioner, the concerned bank has already defreezed the account of the petitioner. 2) In view of the same, nothing survives in the present criminal writ petition and the same stands disposed of. (VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV) JUDGE (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE Komal Kamble Page| 1 of 1 2026:BHC-AUG:44067-DB