Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12365 (BOM)

BHASKAR S/O TULSHIRAM GHORPADE v. STATE OF MAHA., THR. ITS SECY. DEPARTMENT OF VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT AND ORS.

WP/7778/2026 · 2026-09-29

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 103.wp.7778.2026.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. WRIT PETITION NO. 7778 OF 2026 Bhaskar S/o. Tulshiram Ghorpade .Vs. State of Maharashtra and others _______________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders. Mr S. U. Bhuyar, Advocates for the petitioner/s Ms K. P. Marpakwar, AGP for respondent Nos. 1 and 2 CORAM : ANIL S. KILOR AND RAJNISH R. VYAS, JJ. DATED : 29 th SEPTEMBER , 2026 . Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that initially the respondents had issued notices and fixed the matter on 26/10/2026, but thereafter it was preponed on 26/09/2026, intimation of which was given to the petitioner yesterday i.e. 28/09/2026. He further submits that the matter is now fixed today at 3:00 p.m. and if a short adjournment request is not considered irreparable loss will be caused o the petitioner. 3. At this stage, we would like to state that as the petitioner can always prefer an application before the concerned authority narrating the difficulty which is likely to be faced by him, we are not inclined to entertain the present writ petition. 2026:BHC-NAG:12848-DB 2 103.wp.7778.2026.odt 4. Accordingly, the writ petition stands, disposed of. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. No costs. 5. We grant liberty to the petitioner to prefer an appropriate application before the respondent-authority for grant of adjournment. [RAJNISH R. VYAS, J] [ANIL S. KILOR, J.] Namrata Signed by: Miss Namrata Suryawanshi Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 29/09/2026 13:29:21