Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12364 (PNJ)

DEEPAK SUKHIJA v. MAHABIR PRASAD, IAS, COMMISSIONER, MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, YAMUNA NAGAR

COCP/282/2026 · 2026-03-17

Nidhi Gupta

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

COCP-282 IN THE HI 218 Deepak Sukh Mahabir Par CORAM: H Present: - NIDHI GUP 1. violation of Court in CW Haryana and direction to of the petitio of hearing to receiving cer 2. submits that (Annexure P the responde petitioner. A 282-2026 -1- E HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H COCP Date o k Sukhija Versus ir Parsad M: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH Mr. Ankit Chauhan, Advocate f Mr. RS Budhwar, Advocate for I GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The present contempt petitio on of order dated 14.10.2025 (Annex CWP-30431-2025, titled as ‘Deep and others’ whereby the writ peti on to the respondent to consider the l petitioner; and pass a speaking order ring to the petitioner, within a period o ing certified copy of the said order. At the very outset, learned ts that in compliance of the Writ C xure P-1), a Speaking Order dated 30 spondent after affording an opportuni As such, nothing survives in the p ND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-282-2026 Date of Decision: 17.03.2026 .… Petitioner .... Respondent NIDHI GUPTA ocate for the petitioner. ate for the respondent. petition has been filed alleging (Annexure P-1) passed by the Writ Deepak Sukhija vs. The State of rit petition was disposed of with a r the legal notice dated 08.09.2025 order, after affording an opportunity eriod of 03 months from the date of arned counsel for the respondent rit Court order dated 14.10.2025 30.01.2025 has been passed by ortunity of personal hearing to the n the present petition. ging Writ e of a 025 nity te of dent 025 d by the RISHU KATARIA 2026.03.17 20:07 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. COCP-282 3. Court is tak learned coun 4. 5. required to b of, according 6. Speaking O action still su 7. 8. 17.03.2026 rishu 282-2026 -2- Copy of Speaking Order dated is taken on record. A copy thereof d counsel for the petitioner. Heard. In view of the facts noted ed to be passed in the present petition ordingly. The petitioner would be at libe Order, in accordance with law, i still survives. Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, s 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable r dated 30.01.2026 handed over in thereof, has also been supplied to above, no further orders are tition; and the same stands disposed at liberty to challenge the aforesaid , if so advised or any cause of any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE ned Yes/No Yes/No r in d to are sed said e of RISHU KATARIA 2026.03.17 20:07 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.