Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12360 (AP)

K Abdul Hadi v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

CRLP/8447/2026 · 2026-10-06

Y Lakshmana Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGHCOURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI MAIN CASE No: Crl.P.No.8447 of 2026 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl. No. DATE ORDER OFFICE NOTE 07.10.2026 Dr.YLR,J Petitioner No.1/Accused No.1 is aged about 22 years. He is a student. Petitioner No.2/Accused No.2 is a practicing advocate. There are long-standing civil disputes between the petitioners and de-facto complainant. The petitioners are permitted to implead the de-facto complainant as respondent No.2. Petitioner is also directed to take-out personal notice on respondent No.2 and file proof to that effect. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Assistant Public Prosecutor. Petitioner No.2/Accused No.2 is present before this Court and he is a practicing advocate stated that de- facto complainant keeping in lieu of certain grudges and civil disputes and with a view to ruin his career have foisted false case against him. Having regard to the facts and circumstances, gravity and nature of allegations leveled against the petitioners, the Investigation Officer is directed not to arrest the petitioners until next date of hearing, but the petitioners are directed to appear before the Investigation Officer and continue to appear before the Investigation Officer as and when required. The Investigation Officer is directed to conduct the investigation. The petitioners are directed to co-operate with the investigation and If the petitioners do not cooperate, the Investigation Officer is directed to take action in accordance with law. Post on 28.10.2026. _________ Dr.YLR,J DRNR