MANBHARI DEVI W/O RAMSWAROOP v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/16078/2026 · 2026-08-17
Sameer Jain
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 12351 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 12351 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:32602] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16078/2026 CNR: RJHC020696182026 | URN: CW / 34071U / 2026 Manbhari Devi W/o Ramswaroop, Aged About 56 Years, R/o 196, Raigaro Ka Mohalla, Bilandpur, Tehsil Shahpura, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Women And Child Development Department, Government Secretariat Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2. The Director, Integrated Child Development Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur.
3. The Dy. Director, Women And Child Development Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur.
4. The Child Development Project Officer, Women And Child Development Department, Shahpura, District Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Pratap Saini with Mr. Aamir Khan For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Judgment 17/08/2026
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was retired from service on 30.06.2026, whereas the petitioner ought to have been retired on 31.12.2029. It is contended that correct date of birth of the petitioner is 01.01.1970 instead of
15.06.1965. It is additionally submitted that the Aadhaar Card issued by the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) of the petitioner correctly reflects her date of birth as 01.01.1970.
[2026:RJ-JP:32602] (2 of 2) [CW-16078/2026]
2. In view of the above grievance, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the instant petition can be disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file a representation within a period of 7 days, in light of the judgment passed by this Court in Pawan Meena vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1665/2024) and the Circular issued by the Chief Secretary for the State of Rajasthan, dated 19.02.2024 (No. i- 10¼1½ izlq-@vuqq- &1@2012).
3. Heard the submissions advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner.
4. Having regard to the limited prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court directs respondent No.2 to consider the representation of the petitioner, if filed within the stipulated time, and decide the same within a period of 30 days from the date of such filing, and the same shall be decided strictly in accordance with law, as per the ratio encapsulated by this Court in Pawan Meena (supra) and in light of the Circular dated
19.02.2024.
5. In light of the aforestated directions, the present writ petition stands disposed of with the aforesaid liberty being granted. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
(SAMEER JAIN),J JKP/s-704