Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12349 (MAD)

Tvl.MRT Enterprises v. The Commercial Tax Officer

WP/11470/2026 · 2026-03-25

C Saravanan

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 WP No. 11470 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 25-03-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN WP No. 11470 of 2026 and WMP Nos.12499 & 12501 of 2026 Tvl.MRT Enterprises (Rep. by its Proprietor Selvaraj Mariyasebastin Raj) SF NO 41/5, 41/6B, Jas Complex, Salem Chennai Bypass, near and Mahal, Madur, Kallakurichi, Tamil Nadu – 606202. Petitioner(s) Vs The Commercial Tax Officer Kallakurichi Assessment Circle, Nepal Street Extension, Near Periyar TNSTC Bus Depot, Kallakurichi, Tamil nadu-606 202 Respondent(s) PRAYER Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records on the files of the Respondent herein in FORM GST DRC-07 with Reference No. ZD3309254376526 dated 30.09.2025 along with the detailed order in GSTIN /33DUCPM9036D1ZS/ 2022-23 dated 30.09.2025 for the tax period April 2022 March 2023 and quash the same. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2 WP No. 11470 of 2026 For Petitioner(s): Mr. Kamala Kanth S For Respondent (s): Mr.V. Prashanth Kiran Government Advocate ORDER Mr.V. Prashanth Kiran, learned Government Advocate takes notice for the Respondent. 2. This Writ Petition is being disposed of at the stage of admission itself with the consent of the learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Government Advocate for the Respondent. 3. In this Writ Petition, the Petitioner has challenged the impugned Order dated 30.09.2025, which was preceded by a Show Cause Notice in GST DRC-01 dated 04.03.2025 wherein the Petitioner was called upon to appear for personal hearing. However, the Petitioner did not take advantage of the same and has thus suffered the impugned Order dated 30.09.2025. 4. It is noticed that the limitation for filing an appeal under Section 107 of the respective GST enactments, 2017 against the impugned Order has already expired long before. However, the present Writ Petition has been filed only on 18.03.2026. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 3 WP No. 11470 of 2026 5. At this stage, the learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner is willing to pre-deposit 25% of the disputed tax as a condition for denovo adjudication and he has also made an endorsement to that effect in the Court bundle. 6. The learned counsel for the Petitioner has also made an following endorsement to that effect in the Court bundle which has been extracted hereunder:- “The Petitioner counsel accept to paid the Tax disputed of 25% tax value.” 7. Recording the above consent given by the Petitioner, the case is remitted back to the Respondent to pass a fresh order on merits subject to the Petitioner depositing 25% of the disputed tax in cash or from the Petitioner's Electronic Cash Register within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 8. Within such time, the Petitioner shall also file a reply to the Show Cause Notice in GST DRC-01 dated 04.03.2025 together with requisite documents to substantiate the case by treating the impugned Order dated 30.09.2025 as an addendum to the Show Cause Notice dated 04.03.2025. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 4 WP No. 11470 of 2026 9. In case the Petitioner complies with the above stipulations, the Respondent shall proceed to pass a final order on merits and in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible, preferably, within a period of three (3) months of such reply/pre-deposit. Subject to the Petitioner complying with the above stipulations, the attachment of the bank account of the Petitioner if any, shall also stand automatically vacated. 10. It is made clear that bank attachment shall be lifted subject to the Petitioner depositing 25% of the disputed tax as ordered above and the Petitioner not being in arrears of any other amount for any other tax period barring the amount demanded under the impugned Order. 11. In case the Petitioner fails to comply with any of the stipulations, the Respondent is at liberty to proceed against the Petitioner to recover the tax in accordance with law as if this Writ Petition was dismissed in limine today. 12. Needless to state, before passing any such order, the Respondent shall give due notice to the Petitioner. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 5 WP No. 11470 of 2026 13. This Writ Petition stands disposed of with the above observations. No costs. Connected Writ Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. 25-03-2026 Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No kp To The Commercial Tax Officer Kallakurichi Assessment Circle, Nepal Street Extension, Near Periyar TNSTC Bus Depot, Kallakurichi, Tamil nadu-606 202. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 6 WP No. 11470 of 2026 C.SARAVANAN J. kp WP No. 11470 of 2026 25-03-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis