BAL KRISHAN AND ANOTHER v. ABHISHEK JAIN AND OTHERS
COPC/394/2026 · 2026-06-19
Sushil Kukreja
Contempt Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 12347 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 12347 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 ( 2026:HHC:23197 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
COPC No. 394 of 2026
Decided on: 19.06.2026 ________________________________________________ Bal Krishan & Anr. ....Petitioners Versus
Dr. Abhishek Jain & Ors. …Respondents _ Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioners : Mr. Prashant Manhans, Advocate, vice Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General. Sushil Kukreja, Judge (oral) Compliance affidavit has been filed, wherein, it has been stated that in compliance to the directions passed by this Court, the representation of the petitioners has been considered and decided vide order dated 25.04.2026 and they were granted higher pay scale of Rs. 47,000/- after two years of regular service, subject to final outcome of LPA and any other legal remedies. 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2 ( 2026:HHC:23197 )
2. Since judgment under reference stood duly complied with, therefore, no further orders are required to be passed in the present contempt petition and the matter is closed.
3. However, if the petitioner are still aggrieved, they are at liberty to avail appropriate remedy, as available to them, under the law.
4. The petition is disposed of, so also pending application(s), if any.
( Sushil Kukreja )
19th June, 2026 Judge (raman)