Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12346 (GAU)

HARUNAL RASHID BHUYAN v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

AB/1652/2026 · 2026-08-04

Sanjeev Kumar Sharma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010125992026 2026:GAU-AS:10941 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/1652/2026 HARUNAL RASHID BHUYAN W/O SULAIMAN ALI BHUYAN R/O TUKRAPARA P.S. GOROIMARI DISTRICT KAMRUP ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR ASSAM. ------------ Advocate for : MR F HAQUE Advocate for : PP ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA ORDER 05.08 . 2026 Heard Mr. F. Haque, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. B. Sarma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State as well as Mr. Amir Hussain, learned counsel for the informant. Page No.# 2/3 2. This application under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023 has been filed by the petitioner, namely, Harunal Rashid Bhuyan, who was arrested on 30.05.2026 granting of pre-arrest bail in connection with Goroimari P.S. Case No.27/2026 registered under Sections 329(3)/ 118(2)/ 109/ 3(5) of BNS, 2023. 3. The allegation pertains to assault committed upon the sons of the informant by the petitioner resulting in serious injuries. 4. The petitioner has been granted interim protection on the basis of an affidavit that was stated to have been sworn by one Chayad Ali Bhuyan/ informant wherein it is stated that the present petitioner is not involved in the alleged offence. 5. Case Diary as called for is received along with injury report. 6. The informant has submitted objection in a connected application i.e, AB/1388/2026, stating that the thumb impression of the informant was obtained on the said affidavit by practicing fraud by one Aayub Ali, son of Bandu Sheikh by stating that apart from the FIR already lodged, certain additional papers are required to be signed for submission of the same before the police and the Court. It is further stated that believing such representation of Aayub Ali to be genuine, the applicant accompanied Aayub Ali to Amingaon and by taking advantage of distressed mental state of the informant, the said Aayub Ali obtained the thump impressions of the informant on several papers including certain blank papers which was not read over to the informant. 7. The learned Additional P.P on perusal of the CD along with the injury report submits that the statements of the injured witnesses clearly reveals the role of the petitioner along with other accused persons and overt act has been Page No.# 3/3 attributed to them in assaulting and causing grievous injuries upon the vital part of the body of the victim by sharp weapon and thereby causing grievous injuries. 8. Having regards to the material available in the CD and the stand of the informant the prayer for bail stands rejected. 9. Anticipatory Bail petition stands dismissed. 10. Send back the CD. JUDGE Comparing Assistant