Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12345 (GAU)

JASIM UDDIN BARBHUIYA v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 9 ORS.

I.A.(Civil)/2793/2026 · 2026-08-16

Arun Dev Choudhury

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010164852026 2026:GAU-AS:11619-DB THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2793/2026 JASIM UDDIN BARBHUIYA S/O SAMSUL HOQUE BARBHUIYA, VILLAGE BHAIRABPUR PART V, P.O. KALAIN, DISTRICT CACHAR, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 9 ORS. REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY, HOME AND POLITICAL DEPARTMENT, JANATA BHAWAN, DISPUR, GUWAHATI 781006. 2:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE ULUBARI GUWAHATI 781007 ASSAM. 3:THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE SILCHAR CACHAR 788001 ASSAM. 4:THE OFFICER IN CHARGE DHOLAI POLICE STATION SILCHAR CACHAR 788001 ASSAM. 5:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER SILCHAR CACHAR 788001 ASSAM. 6:THE ADDITIONAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER Page No.# 2/3 SILCHAR CACHAR 788001 ASSAM 7:THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER AND BENCH OFFICER PUBLIC GRIEVANCES SILCHAR CACHAR 788001 ASSAM. 8:THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE IC PUBLIC GRIEVANCES OFFICER SILCHAR CACHAR 788001 ASSAM. 9:THE UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS NORTH BLOCK NEW DELHI 110001. 10:THE CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR GENERAL BLOCK NO. 1 C.G.O. COMPLEX LODHI ROAD NEW DELHI 110001 Advocate for the Petitioner : DIPTI CHAKRAVARTY, MR. P K MUNIR,MR. A. GAYAN Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I., GA, ASSAM – B E F O R E – HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. ASHUTOSH KUMAR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY 17.08.2026 (Arun Dev Choudhury, J) This interlocutory application has been filed by the Page No.# 3/3 applicant seeking condonation of delay of 38 days in preferring the connected appeal against the judgment and order dated 13.05.2026, passed by the learned Single Judge in WP(C) No.6365/2022. We have heard Mr. P.K. Munir, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Mr. R.K. Borah, learned Additional Senior Government Advocate appearing for the respondents. After going through the averments made in the application, we are satisfied that good grounds have been assigned by the applicants for condoning the delay of 38 days in preferring the connected appeal. We, therefore, condone the delay. The Interlocutory Application stands disposed off. The Registry to process the connected appeal and, if found defect free, list the same on 30.09.2026 in the admission column. JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE Comparing Assistant