1 2026:CGHC:492 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SA No. 657 of 2015 Laxmi Bai D/o Kishorelal Gond, Aged About 47 Years Occupation Agriculturist, R/o Village Kharthulli, Tahsil Balod, District Balod, Chhattisgarh .........Plaintiff, ... Petitioner versus 1 - Brijlal And Others S/o Jethuram Gond, Aged About 66 Years R/o Village Chandanbihari, Tahsil Gurur, District Balod, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Smt. Sati Bai Wd/o Laxman, Aged About 40 Years Caste- Gond, R/o Village Chandanbihari, Tahsil Gurur, District Balod, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Smt. Meena W/o Narayan Thakur, Aged About 21 Years R/o Village Chandanbihari, Tahsil Gurur, District Balod, Chhattisgarh. 4 - Khilesh S/o Laxman Thakur, Aged About 19 Years R/o Village Chandanbihari, Tahsil Gurur, District Balod, Chhattisgarh. 5 - Vikas S/o Laxman Thakur, Aged About 17 Years Minor Through Natural Guardian Mother Smt. Sati Bai, R/o Village Chandanbihari, Tahsil Gurur, District Balod, Chhattisgarh. 6 - Yogesh S/o Laxman Thakur, Aged About 14 Years Minor Through Natural Guardian Mother Smt. Sati Bai, R/o Village Chandanbihari, Tahsil Gurur, District Balod, Chhattisgarh. 7 - Gajanand Thakur S/o Channulal Thakur, Aged About 46 Years Caste- Gond, R/o Village Baghmara, Tahsil Balod, District Balod, Chhattisgarh. 8 - Shriram S/o Jhaduram Gond, Aged About 36 Years R/o Village Kharthuli, Tahsil Balod, District Balod, Chhattisgarh. 2 9 - Sahdev S/o Jhaduram Gond, Aged About 31 Years R/o Village Kharthuli, Tahsil Balod, District Balod, Chhattisgarh. 10 - Gayaram S/o Tijauram Gond, Aged About 60 Years R/o Village Kharthuli, Tahsil Balod, District Balod, Chhattisgarh. 11 - Awadhram S/o Roopsingh Halba, Aged About 33 Years R/o Village Kharthuli, Tahsil Balod, District Balod, Chhattisgarh. 12 - The State Of Chhattisgarh, Through The Collector, Balod, District Balod, Chhattisgarh ..........Defendants ... Respondents For Appellant : None For Respondent No. 7 : Mr. Roshan Singh, Advocate holding brief of Mr. B. P. Singh, Advocate For Res. Nos. 8 to 11 : Ms. Deeksha Jaiswal, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Goutam Khetrapal, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput Order On Board 05/01/2026 1. Mr. Amit Sahu, learned counsel appears and submits that file is not available in his office and also pleads no instruction in the matter. 2. In view of the above, it appears that the petitioner does not want to prosecute the present petition. Therefore, this Court is left with no other option, but to dismiss the petition for want of prosecution. 3. Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Sachin Singh Rajput ) Judge Ami AMITA DUBEY Digitally signed by AMITA DUBEY Date: 2026.01.08 15:32:57 +0530