Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12345 (ALL)

PRAVESH KUMAR MISHRA v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/40853/2026 · 2026-10-06

Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra, Siddhartha Varma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 40853 of 2026 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE SIDDHARTHA VARMA, J. HON'BLE RAM MANOHAR NARAYAN MISHRA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondent no. 1 and Sri Kaushalendra Nath Singh, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 2, 3 and 4. 2. After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner states that he does not want to press this writ petition and seeks to withdraw it with liberty to file fresh writ petition with better particulars. 3. In view of the above statement, the instant writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. 4. Certified copy of the documents be returned to learned counsel for the petitioner as per Rules. October 7, 2026 Vikram Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashutosh Gupta Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Kaushalendra Nath Singh (Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra,J.) (Siddhartha Varma,J.) Pravesh Kumar Mishra .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VIKRAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad