DEEPAK S/O JIWATRAM AHUJA v. STATE OF MAHA., THR. MINISRY OF TRIBAL WELFARE AND SOCI. JUSTICE DEPT. THR. SECY., MUMBAI AND ANR.
CAW/2087/2026 · 2026-09-24
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 12343 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 12343 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
(1) 49.caw.2087.2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION (CAW) NO.2087 OF 2026 IN WRIT PETITION NO.4988 OF 2026
Deepak s/o Jiwatram Ahuja Vs. State of Maharashtra through the Ministry of Tribal Welfare and Social Justice Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai through its Secretary and Anr.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. Kunal Pande, Advocate h/f Mr. Ved Deshpande, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. V. A. Thakare, AGP for respondent Nos.1 and 2 - State. Mr. M. M. Agnihotri, Advocate with Mr. Parth Lalit Sagdeo, Advocate for intervenors.
CORAM : URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE AND RAJ D. WAKODE, JJ.
DATED : 24/09/2026
1. The intervenor i.e. the original complainants have preferred this application to intervene in the matter. It is submitted by the applicants that the petitioner himself has unequivocally admitted in the writ petition that the present applicants are the complainants whose complaints have resulted in the initiation of the impugned proceedings. The entire cause of action pleaded in the writ petition arises out of and in connection with the complaints submitted by the applicants and, therefore, they are necessary parties. However, they are not added as party and, therefore, they be permitted to intervene in the application.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has no objection for the same. 2026:BHC-NAG:12820-DB
(2) 49.caw.2087.2026
3. In view of that, the application is allowed.
4.
Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to add the intervenors as a necessary party, as a party respondent.
5. The Civil application is disposed of.
WRIT PETITION NO.4988 OF 2026
1.
Learned counsel for the intervenors Mr. Agnihotri, seeks time to file reply.
2. Stand over to 09.10.2026.
3. Interim relief, if any, to continue till next date.
(RAJ D. WAKODE, J) (URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, J) Sarkate Signed by: Mr. A.R. Sarkate Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 28/09/2026 21:25:40