Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1234 (CAL)

HALADHAR MAHATO v. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA(H)/12/2025 · 2026-04-07

Debangsu Basak, Md Shabbar Rashidi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

C o u r t N . 2 2 S l 1 5 1 / C L DL-2 07.04.2026 Court No.37 [Bench ID-266046] (AD) In the High Court at Calcutta Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Appellate Side WPA (H) 12 of 2025 Sri Haladhar Mahato Vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Sougata Mitra, Advocate Mr. Nikhil Kumar Gupta, Advocate Ms. Soma Chakraborty, Advocate Mr. Subhadeep Maitra, Advocate … for the petitioner Ms. Faria Hossain, Ld. APP Mr. Simanta Kabir, Advocate … for the State 1. Writ petition is taken up for consideration subsequent to the order dated February 3, 2026. 2. By our order dated February 3, 2026, we permitted the parties to use affidavits. 3. Learned Advocate appearing for the State submits that, the victim along with the two children were recovered. 4. The children are presently at Home. 5. Statement of the victim under Section 183 of the BNSS is scheduled to be recorded today. 6. Since the victim and the children stand recovered, no further order need be passed in this habeas corpus writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. 2 7. WPA (H) 12 of 2025 is disposed of without any order as to costs. (Debangsu Basak, J.) (Md. Shabbar Rashidi, J.)