( 2026:HHC:23257 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No. 2530 of 2015 Decided on: 19.06.2026 ___________________________________________________________ Neelam & Anr. ....Petitioners Versus State of H.P. & Ors. ……Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge 1 Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioners: Mr. Pavan Kumar, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. I.N. Mehta, Senior Additional Advocate General, with Mr. Pawan Kumar Nadda, Additional Advocate General, for respondents No. 1 to 3- State. Respondent No. 4 ex parte vide order dated 02.09.2016. Ranjan Sharma, Judge (Oral) Learned Counsel for the petitioners states that in terms of the previous orders, he has been directed by Mr. Subhash Sharma, Learned Senior Counsel who was the Original Counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners are not responding and appropriate orders may be passed 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? ( 2026:HHC:23257 ) [Statement Taken on Record]. 2. Considering the above facts the instant petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. In aforesaid terms, the writ petition and all pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (Ranjan Sharma) Judge 19th June, 2026 (Shamsh Tabrez) 2