HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 215 of 2005 Court No. - 36 HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J. 1. None present on behalf of petitioner. 2. Following interim order was passed by this Court on 6.1.2005: “Sri Rajeev Sharma has accepted notice on behalf of the respondent. He prays for and is allowed one month’s time to file counter affidavit. Rejoinder affidavit may be filed within one week thereafter. List for admission on expiry of aforesaid period. Till the next date of listing no further action shall be taken against the petitioner in pursuance of the order dated 07.12.2004.“ 3. Main ground for challenging the impugned order in the writ petition is to dispute the inspection that 17 persons were engaged out of which only 14 persons were regular employees and 3 were casual employees, whereas according to impugned order 20 persons were working in the establishment as on 8.2.1995. 4. In the aforesaid circumstances, since the interim order is operating for more than last two decades, therefore, same shall continue for a period of 4 weeks from today. 5. Meanwhile, the respondent is directed to conduct a fresh inspection and pass a fresh order within the aforesaid period if the establishment still survives. Impugned order shall be subject to fresh order. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vipin Sinha Counsel for Respondent(s) : Ankur Agarwal, D.K.Dubey, Rajiv Sharma, S.C., Sachindra Upadhyay Narendra Kumar Gupta And Another .....Petitioner(s) The Regional Provident Fund .....Respondent(s) 6. Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of. 7. Sri Priyanshu, Advocate holding brief of Sri Ankur Agarwal is present on behalf of learned counsel for the respondent. October 5, 2026 SB WRIC No. 215 of 2005 2 (Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.) Digitally signed by :- SANDEEP BHATTACHARYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad