Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12330 (JHR)

SANJAY KUMAR v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./2607/2026 · 2026-05-14

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:14793 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B. A. No. 2607 of 2026 Sanjay Kumar, aged about 34 years, son of Shiv Shankar Saw, resident of Bazar Tand Ramgarh, Near Deshbandhu School, P.O. Ramgarh, P.S. Ramgarh, District-Ramgarh, Jharkhand ...... … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .…. … Opposite Party -------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioner :Mr. Satyendra Kr. Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Sardhu Mahto, A.P.P. 02/ 14.05.2026: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Patratu (Bhurkunda) P.S. Case No. 264/2025, registered under sections 126(2)/115(2)/308(3)/140/3(5) of B.N.S., pending in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class at Ramgarh. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that so far as this petitioner is concerned, there are general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner and he has been falsely implicated in the case. He next submits that the main allegation is there against Md. Jamir and in his anticipatory bail application, this court has been pleased to call the case diary. He next submits that the learned court has rejected the anticipatory bail of this petitioner only on the ground that the said Md. Jamir is having eight criminal antecedents. He next submits that so far as this petitioner is concerned, he is having no criminal antecedent as disclosed in para 12 of the petition. He submits that co-accused persons have been granted anticipatory bail in A.B.A. No. 725 of 2026 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposed the prayer and submits that the petitioner is said to be accomplice of Md. Jamir. 5. Looking into the contents of the FIR, it transpires that the ( 2026:JHHC:14793 ) allegation of abducting and threatening and even demanding money are there against Md. Jamir. The petitioner is having no criminal antecedent which is disclosed in para 12 of the petition and the learned court, only on the criminal antecedents of Md. Jamir, rejected the anticipatory bail application of this petitioner and co-accused persons have been granted anticipatory bail in A.B.A. No. 725 of 2026, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to these petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the petitioner above named is directed to surrender before the learned Court within three weeks from the date of receipt of the order and on the event of his surrender / arrest, he shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty-Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount of each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class at Ramgarh, in connection with Patratu (Bhurkunda) P.S. Case No. 264/2025, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. Dt.14.05.2026 ( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) satyarthi-