Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1233 (AP)

RAGAAM VENKATA RAMANA v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/10680/2026 · 2026-04-22

Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010206542026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] THURSDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 10680/2026 Between: 1. RAGAAM VENKATA RAMANA, S/O. SAMBASIVA RAO, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, R/O. DOOR NO. 16-5-148, BALAJI NAGAR, 1ST LINE. OLD GUNTUR, GUNTUR 2. KOLLIPARA NAVEEN KUMAR,, S/O. RADHA KRISHNA MURTHY AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/O. DOOR NO.8-5-22, SATTENAPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. PONNEKANTI KRISHNA RAO,, S/O. LAKSHMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, R/O. SIVALAYAM VEEDI, SATTENAPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. CHIRRAVURI NAGA KIRANMAYI,, W/O. RACHARLA SRINIVASULU, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/O. SIVALAYAM VEEDI, SATTENAPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT - 532227 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT - 532227 2 SECRETARY 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, NARASARAO PETA, PALNADU DISTRICT -522601. 4. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, NARASARAOPET - 522601 5. THE SATTENAPALLI MUNICIPALITY, REP BY ITS COMMISSIONER SATTENAPALLI, PALNADU DISTRICT - 522403. 6. MANDAL REVENUE OFFICER, SATTENAPALLI VILLAGE AND MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT - 522403 7. THE COMMISSIONER OF ENDOWMENTS, ENDOWMENT DEPARTMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH VIJAYAWADA - 520001 8. THE AP CAPITAL REGION DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, APCRDA REP BY ITS COMMISSIONER, NEAR AP HIGH COURT, VELAGAPUDI - 532227 ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. KANADHI BHATLA SRINIVASA MURTHY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 2. GP FOR ENDOWMENTS 3. GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP The Court made the following: ORAL ORDER: Heard Sri K. Srinivasa Murthy, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioners and Smt. Sireesha Rani Vallabhaneni, learned Standing Counsel for Municipalities. 2. Smt. Sireesha Rani Vallabhaneni, learned Standing Counsel for Municipalities has submitted the Written Instructions furnished by the Commissioner of Sattenapalli Municipality, dated 21.04.2026. Copy of it is 3 supplied to the Counsel for the Writ Petitioners and the same is taken on record. 3. In the penultimate paragraph of the Written Instructions, the Commissioner has stated that the Municipality would follow due process of law while initiating the formation of 40-feet Master Plan Road. 4. Having noted the same, this Court deems it appropriate to dispose of this Writ Petition with a direction to the Respondent Officials to follow due process of law for the aforesaid purpose. 5. With these observations and directions, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. 6. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 23.04.2026 DSV 4 158 HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 10680/2026 23.04.2026 DSV 5 HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATHI MAIN CASE No : WRIT PETITION NO: 10680/2026 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl. No DATE ORDER Office Note 2. 23.04.2026 GRKP, J Writ Petition is disposed of. (vide separate order) ___________ GRKP, J DSV 6 7