- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:10622 WP No. 3303 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 3303 OF 2026 (GM-POLICE) BETWEEN: SRI C V JAYARAME GOWDA S/O LATE. VENKATEGOWDA @ VENKATAPPA, AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS, R/AT CHALAPALLI VILLAGE, ALANGURU POST, KASABA HOBLI, MULBAGAL TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT-563131. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. ADINARAYANAPPA., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA HOME DEPARTMENT, (RECEIPTS AND ISSUE), NO.233A, 2ND FLOOR, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560 001. REPT. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY. 2. THE POLICE INSPECTOR, NANGALI POLICE STATION, NANGALI, MULBAGAL TALUK, Digitally signed by VANAMALA N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:10622 WP No. 3303 of 2026 KOLAR DISTRICT-563132. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.B.RAVINDRANATH, AGA) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO I) DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS TO TAKE SUITABLE ACTION ON THE COMPLAINTS OF THE PETITIONER DATED 07.09.2024 AND 16.08.2025 WHICH ARE PRODUCED AT ANNEX-C AND F IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW; II) CONSEQUENTLY DIRECT THE RESPONDENT TO GIVE PROPER PROTECTION TO THE PETITIONER AND HIS PROPERTY BY CONSIDERING HIS COMPLAINTS WHICH ARE PRODUCED ANNEX-C AND F DATED 07.09.2024 AND 16.08.2025. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY 0HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:10622 WP No. 3303 of 2026 ORAL ORDER The petitioner relies upon the Judgment and Decree in a suit for permanent injunction in O.S.No.227/2006 on the file of the Principal Civil Judge [Jr.Dn.] and JMFC at Mulbagal to contend that this Court must direct the jurisdictional police to extend protection because the defendants therein are trying to interfere with the petitioner's possession notwithstanding the decree of permanent injunction. Sri.B.Ravindranath, the learned Additional Government Advocate who is directed to accept notice of the respondents, is heard. This Court must observe that the decree in the suit in O.S.No.227/2006 is in the year 2007 and is an ex- parte decree. If there is any interference notwithstanding such decree, the petitioner, especially after this length of time, must avail remedy as is permissible under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 and seek specific directions from the concerned. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:10622 WP No. 3303 of 2026 As such, the petition stands disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to approach the jurisdictional police with specific directions from the concerned Court. Sd/- (B M SHYAM PRASAD) JUDGE RS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 31