2026:JHHC:15124 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 3562 of 2026 Mithun Lohra @ Vikash Jee @ Vikash Kumar @ Vikash Ji, S/o Aklesh Mistri … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party --- CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Ms. Priyanka Agrawal, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Ms. Priya Shrestha, APP --- 03/15.05.2026 Heard the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 15.09.2025 in connection with S.T. Case No. 275 of 2025 arising out of Chandwa P.S. Case No. 161 of 2025, registered under sections 111(1), 111(4), 308(1), 308(5), 308(6), 109, 326(g), 61 and 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and section 27 of Arms Act, now pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Latehar. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the bail application of the petitioner was withdrawn earlier in B.A. No. 11242 of 2025 vide order dated 18.02.2026. However, the co-accused namely, Prabhat Kumar Yadav has been enlarged on bail in B.A. No. 679 of 2026 vide order dated 02.04.2026. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that the case of the petitioner is on identical footing as that of the aforesaid co- accused and there is no recovery from the possession of the present petitioner. She further submits that no TIP has been conducted and except confession statement, there is nothing against the petitioner. 5. Learned counsel for the opposite party- State, on the other hand, has opposed the prayer for bail. 6. After hearing the learned counsels for the parties and considering the fact that similarly situated co-accused namely, Prabhat Kumar Yadav has been enlarged on bail by this Court vide order dated 02.04.2026 passed in B.A. No. 679 of 2026, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees 2026:JHHC:15124 2 twenty-five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Latehar in connection with S.T. Case No. 275 of 2025 arising out of Chandwa P.S. Case No. 161 of 2025, on the following conditions: (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (ii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of even single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (iv) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned trial court. 7. The instant application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions. 8. Let this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through FAX/e- mail. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Date of Order:15.05.2026 Pankaj Date of Uploading:16.05.2026