1 ( 2026:HHC:23198 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No. 500 of 2026 Decided on: 19.06.2026 ________________________________________________ Mangat Ram ....Petitioner Versus Rakesh Kanwar & Anr. …Respondents _ Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Balbir Singh, Advocate, vice Mr. Naresh Kaul, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General. Sushil Kukreja, Judge (oral) Learned Additional Advocate General has placed on record communication dated nil, alongwith Office Order dated 26.05.2026, wherein, it has been stated that in compliance to the directions passed by this Court, representation of the petitioner has been considered and decided by the respondents-Department by way of passing detailed order dated 26.05.2026. 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 ( 2026:HHC:23198 ) 2. Since judgment under reference stood duly complied with, therefore, no further orders are required to be passed in the present contempt petition and the matter is closed. 3. However, if the petitioner is still aggrieved, he is at liberty to assail Office Order dated 26.05.2026, in accordance with law. 4. The petition is disposed of, so also pending application(s), if any. ( Sushil Kukreja ) 19th June, 2026 Judge (raman)