Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1231 (RAJ)

SUGAR SINGH S/O GABDU v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/5204/2026 · 2026-04-07

Pramil Kumar Mathur

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:14330] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5204/2026 Sugar Singh S/o Gabdu, Aged About 62 Years, R/o Gabdupura, Police Station Mansalpur, District Karauli (Raj.) (Accused Presently Confined At District Jail, Karauli). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rohit Bhardwaj For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 07/04/2026 1. The petitioner has filed this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.130/2025 registered at Police Station Mansalpur, District Karauli for offence under Sections 189(2), 115(2), 126(2), 125 and 329(3) of BNS, 2023. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that though specific act has been attributed to the present petitioner regarding the causing of injuries to the injured, Hakim Singh, but none of the injuries, according to the injury report, are grievous in nature and all have been found to be simple. As per the medical opinion, above injuries are neither fatal nor dangerous to life. Learned counsel contended that, apart from this, no other overt [2026:RJ-JP:14330] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-5204/2026] act has been assigned to the petitioner in the material available on record. He further argued that a cross-case has also been filed by the petitioner's side against the complainant. Learned counsel again submits that the petitioner has been behind bars since 26.09.2025. Though there are three cases pending against the pe- titioner as part of his criminal history but he is on bail in all those cases. It is further submitted that the charge-sheet has already been filed. The trial of the case may take considerable time and no further custodial interrogation is required, hence the bail applica- tion of the petitioner may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material avail- able on record and in the light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Sugar Singh S/o Gabdu, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J bmg/87