Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010057632019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3239] MONDAY, THE 5th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SURESH REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 1246/2019 Between:
1. P.PREMCHNDU, S/O P. DEVA, AGED 21 YEARS, OCC. STUDENT, RIO D.NO. 11-12, KOTHAKOTA, RAVIKAMATHAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DIST. 2. G. DIVAKAR,, S/O SOMU NAIDU, AGED 21 YEARS, OCC. STUDENT, R/O D.NO. 11-12, KOTHAKOTA, RAVIKAMATHAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DIST. 3. DASARI PRAKASH,, SIC RAJU BABU, AGED 21 YEARS, OCC. STUDENT, R/O D.NO. 11-12, KOTHAKOTA, RAVIKAMATHAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DIST. 4. U. MOHAN, , S/O NAIDU, AGED 21 YEARS, OCC. STUDENT, R/O D.NO. 11-12, KOTHAKOTA,
RAVIKAMATHAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DIST. 5. P. SASIKALA,, W/O DEVA, AGED 35 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE WIFE, R/O D.NO. 11-12, KOTHAKOTA, RAVIKAMATHAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 6. P. DEVA, , S/O APPA RAO, AGED 42 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE WIFE, R/O D.NO. 11-12, KOTHAKOTA, RAVIKAMATHAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 7. S. DORA BABU,, S/O RAMANA, AGED 28 YEARS, OCC. DRIVER, RIO D.NO. 11-12, KOTHAKOTA, RAVIKAMATHAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 8. VELLINKI TRIMURTHULU,, SIO VELAMA NAIDU, AGED 50 YEARS, R/O KOTHAKOTA, RAVIKAMATHAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 9. KONKIPUDI SAI,, S/O RAMU, AGED 28 YEARS, OCC. PVT. EMPLOYEE, R/O KOTHAKOTA, RAVIKAMATHAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 10. KONKIPUDI SIVA,, S/O LACHHA, AGED 25 YEARS, OCC. PVT. EMPLOYEES, KOTHAKOTA, RAVIKAMATHAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 11. G. NAGU,, S/O RAMANA, AGED 25 YEARS, OCC. STUDENT, R/O, KOTHAKOTA, RAVIKAMATHAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND
2
1. STATE OF AP, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, A.P. HIGH COURT AT AMARAVATI. 2. ADDURI NETAJI, S/O APPA RAO, AGED 21 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O AMBEDKARNAGAR, KOTHAKOTA VILLAGE, RAVIKAMATHAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S):
1. K B RAMANNA DORA Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S):
1. N SRIHARI
2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following ORDER :-
This Criminal Petition, under Section 482 Cr.P.C., has been filed by the petitioners, seeking to quash the proceedings in Crime No.23 of 2019 of Kothakota Police Station, Visakhapatnam District. 2. Today, when the matter is taken up, learned counsel for the petitioners states that after completing investigation police filed charge sheet and the case also has been committed to the Court of Sessions vide S.C.SPL.No.93 of 2025. As such, the cause in the Criminal Petition does not survive for further adjudication. 3. Recording the said statement, the Criminal Petition is dismissed as infructuous.
However, the petitioners are at liberty to challenge the said Session Case, if so advised. As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Criminal Petition shall stand closed. ____ K.SURESH REDDY, J
Dt.05.10.2026 Asr
3
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURESH REDDY
CRIMINAL PETITION No.1246 of 2019
Date: 05.10.2026 Asr