Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12304 (JHR)

SAMIM ANSARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./2454/2026 · 2026-05-13

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:14685 ) -1- A.B.A. No. 2454 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 2454 of 2026 Samim Ansari, aged about 38 years, son of Naim Ansari @ Nyum Ansari, resident of Village- Gamhariya, P.O. & P.S. Sarwan, Dist. Deoghar … Petitioner -Versus- The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ----- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ----- For the Petitioner : Mr. Kamdeo Pandey, Advocate For the State : Mr. Anup Pawan Topno, A.P.P. ----- 03/13.05.2026 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Sarawan P.S. Case No.144/2025, registered for the offence under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109(1), 351(2), 352, 3(5) of the BNS and Section 3/4 of D.P. Act, pending in the Court of the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Deoghar. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that false allegations are made against the petitioner of assault upon the informant. He further submits that the informant is not cooperating and the children are being taken care of by the petitioner. He next submits that there are general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner and even the injury is not found. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposed the prayer and submits that the allegations are there of assault and the petitioner is the husband of the informant and in view of that, the prayer for anticipatory bail may kindly be rejected. 5. Considering that the injury is said to be not found as per the case diary as submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the petitioner is looking after two children as argued by the learned counsel for the petitioner ( 2026:JHHC:14685 ) -2- A.B.A. No. 2454 of 2026 and the petitioner is happened to be husband and in the attending facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the above-named petitioner is directed to surrender before the learned Court within three weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrender, he shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Deoghar in connection with Sarawan P.S. Case No.144/2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated: 13th May, 2026 Ajay/