Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010152162026 2026:GAU-AS:11263 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/1715/2026 SAHANUR ISLAM SON OF ALA MOHAMMAD, VILLAGE HAZARIPARA, P.S. BILASIPARA, DISTRICT DHUBRI, ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. R ALI, MR S KHAN,MISS. S PARBIN,MR H A AHMED Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJAN MONI KALITA ORDER Date : 11.08.2026 1. Heard Mr. H.A. Ahmed, learned counsel for the accused applicant. Also heard Mr. M.P.Goswami, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State respondent. 2. This is an application filed under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023 praying Page No.# 2/3 for grant of pre-arrest bail to the accused applicant namely, Sahanur Islam in connection with Hatigaon P.S. Case No.211/2025 under Sections 61(2)/318(4)/303(2)/308(2)/307/138 of BNS. 3. An FIR was lodged on 03.12.2025 before the Officer-In-Charge of Hatigaon Police Station by the informant alleging inter alia that on 28.11.2025, the informant hired one E-rickshaw wherein 3 passengers were already seated; that when the e-rickshaw moved towards Sijubari, one of the miscreants with the help of handkerchief put something on his face and he became unconscious and thereafter, when he regained his senses, he found himself near the Game Village. Later on, he came to GMCH and got himself examined and he was released after that. He found that several monetary transactions from his Credit Cards and Debit Cards were done by the miscreants and thereby they have stolen an amount of Rs.1,69,000/-. On receipt of the FIR, police registered the Hatigaon P.S. Case No.211/2025 under the aforementioned Sections. 5. The learned counsel appearing for the accused applicant submits that the accused applicant is not involved in any offence and in fact, he has been named by one person due to some enmity. 6. Case Diary has been received and the same is perused. 7. On perusal of the Case diary, this Court finds prima facie materials against the accused- applicant . 8. Accordingly, the prayer for pre-arrest bail of the accused-applicant is rejected. 9. Send back the Case Dairy. JUDGE Page No.# 3/3 Comparing Assistant