Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12294 (AP)

K NARESH KUMAR v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/28725/2022 · 2026-09-28

Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

::1:: APHC010472702022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] TUESDAY, THE 29th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 28725/2022 Between: 1. K NARESH KUMAR, S/O LATE K. VENKATARAMANA NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, OCC. UNEMPLOYED, R/O.D.NO.20-1- 470/A-16, CHANDRA SEKHAR REDDY COLONY, KORLAGUNTA, TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMRAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE TIRUMALA TIRUPATHIDEVASTHANAMS TTD, REP. BY ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER, ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING, K.T.ROAD, TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI (CHITTOOR ) DISTRICT. 3. THE JOINT EXECUTIVE OFFICER, TIRUMALA TIRUPATHIDEVASTHANAMS (TTD), ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING, K.T.ROAD, TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 4. THE DEPUTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER, TIRUMALA TIRUPATHIDEVASTHANAMS (TTD), ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING, K.T.ROAD, TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 5. K DHANAMMA, W/O LATE K.VENKATARAMANA NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEWIFE, R/O. D.NO.20-1-423/1, MARUTHI NAGAR, KORLAGUNTA, TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI ::2:: DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari, calling for all the connected records including the impugned order passed by the Respondent No.3 vide Proceedings Roc.No.TTD-71021(31)/92/2020, dated 14.08.2021 as well as the impugned order passed by the Respondent No.4 vide Proceedings TLS/4153/2022, dated 18.08.2022 and to set aside the same as illegal, improper, unjust, arbitrary, in violation of Principles of Natural Justice and contrary to law and further direct the Respondent No.2 to 4 to appoint the Petitioner on compassionate groundsand to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased please to dispense with the filing of the certified copies of the order of the Respondent No.3 vide Proceedings Roc.No.TTD- 71021(31)/92/2020, dated 14.08.2021 as well as the order passed by the Respondent No.4 vide Proceedings TLS/4153/2022, dated 18.08.2022 in the interest of justice. IA NO: 2 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased please to suspend the operation of the order passed by the Respondent No.4 vide Proceedings TLS/4153/2022, dated 18.08.2022 forthwith, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition,in the interest of justice. IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to vacate the Interim Order dt. 21-09-2022 passed in ::3:: IA.No. 2 of 2021 in WP.No. 28725 of 2022 and dismiss the Writ Petition in the interests of justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. VARUN BYREDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR SERVICES II 2. NIMMAGADDA REVATHI 3. V.DYUMANI (SC for TTD) The Court made the following: ::4:: ORDER: 1. The present writ petition is filed seeking a direction to the respondents to call for all the connected records, including the impugned order passed by the 3rd respondent vide proceedings dated 14.08.2021, as well as the impugned order passed by the 4th respondent vide proceedings dated 18.08.2022. 2. The petitioner filed a suit in O.S.No.892 of 2021 on the file of the learned Principal Junior Civil Judge, Tirupati, seeking the relief claimed in the present writ petition. 3. Therefore, without going into the merits of the case, this Court deems it appropriate to close the writ petition. 4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO 29.09.2026 RMD 109 ::5:: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 28725/2022 29.09.2026 RMD