Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12291 (CAL)

AMINUR RAHAMAN v. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM(A)/896/2025 · 2026-01-06

Tirthankar Ghosh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

06.01.2026 Serial no. 16 [G.S.D] CALCUTTA HIGH COURT IN THE CIRCUIT BENCH AT JALPAIGURI CRM (A) 896 of 2025 In re : An Application under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023/under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with. -And- In the matter of : Aminur Rahaman … Petitioner(s) Mr. Subhasish Misra Mr. Satyajit Paul Mr. Rounak Ghosh … for the petitioner(s) Mr. Biswarup Roy … for the State-respondent(s) Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the present petitioner during the pendency of the application for anticipatory bail has already been arrested, as such, the present application has become infructuous. Learned advocate for the State is present. In view of the submissions advanced by the learned advocate for the petitioner, CRM (A) 896 of 2025 is dismissed as infructuous. Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.) 2