[2026:JHHC:14861] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.4159 of 2026 ------ Rakesh Kumar Mandal, aged about 35 years, son of Babu Lal Mandal, resident of Quarter No.81, N2 Type, new Rani Kudar, Near Hind Club, Kadma, P.O. & P.S. – Kadma, Town – Jamshedpur, District- East Singhbhum, Jharkhand .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Pran Pranay, Advocate For the State : Mr. Prabhu Dayal Agrawal, Spl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated-14-05-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Bistupur P.S. Case No.136 of 2025 corresponding to S.T. No.92 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Section 309 (6) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner committed robbery and caused injury to the victim by throwing chilli powder on the eyes of the victim and looted his bag containing Rs.30,00,000/-. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is next submitted that though the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. yet charge-sheet has been submitted against him without putting him on Test Identification Parade as mentioned in para-10 of the instant bail application. It is next submitted that no witness has been examined in this case. It is further submitted that the co-accused, with similar allegations, has already been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 11.05.2026 passed in B.A. No.3881 of 2026. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 12.09.2025 as has been mentioned in para-18 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Spl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-VI at Jamshedpur in connection with Bistupur P.S. Case No.136 of 2025 corresponding to S.T. No.92 of 2026 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case, furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated-14.05.2026-Animesh/