APHC010159182026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI WRIT PETITION NO: 8248 of 2026 Bench Sr.No:- 20 [3579] Basa Nagveni ...Petitioner Vs. The Union Of India and Others ...Respondent(s) CORAM:- HON’BLE MRS JUSTICE LISA GILL HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA DATE:- 24th APRIL 2026 Present:- Mr. Pala Karthi Kiran, advocate for petitioner. Mr. M. Vinodin Ruth, advocate, appeared for respondent No.3. Mr. Adithya Harsha Vardhan, Advocate representing Law Firm, for respondent No.4. ********** LISA GILL,J. 1. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that I.A.No.536 of 2026 in S.A.No.665 of 2025 is pending before learned Debts Recovery Tribunal (for brevity “DRT”), Visakhapatnam, but the matter is being repeatedly adjourned without any decision on the 2 interim relief(s) being sought. It is in this situation, present petition has been filed. 2. Petitioner, it is submitted, bought house in question in the year 2016 and mortgaged the same with Syndicate Bank (now merged as Canara Bank) and is regularly paying installments. It is submitted that petitioner was shocked to receive a notice memo dated 08.10.2025 from advocate commissioner in Crl.M.P.No.198 of 2025. 3. Learned counsel for respondent No.4-Canara Bank verifies that petitioner has availed of loan facility and is regularly paying installments. 4. During course of arguments, consensus has been arrived at between parties that this matter be decided by learned DRT on its merits thereof. It is submitted that no adjournment shall be sought by any of the parties, though learned counsel for respondents submits that the matter be decided in a time bound manner. 5. Keeping in view the consensus arrived at between parties as above, it is directed that pending S.A.No.665 of 2025 or at least the application seeking interim relief be decided by learned 3 DRT on 30.04.2026, and if not possible on the said date, then definitely within a period of two (02) weeks thereafter. It is clarified that there shall be no extension of such interim relief automatically. 6. Learned counsel for central Bank fairly states that no coercive steps shall be taken till then. 7. Writ Petition is, accordingly disposed of with no expression of opinion on merits of the matter. No order as to costs. Pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of accordingly. (LISA GILL) JUDGE (NINALA JAYASURYA) JUDGE Date: 24.04.2026 ANS 4 194 HON’BLE MRS JUSTICE LISA GILL HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA WRIT PETITION NO: 8248 of 2026 Date: 24.04.2026 ANS