Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12273 (KAR)

SMT.THIMMAMMA v. SRI D RAMANNA

WP/5619/2026 · 2026-02-20

S R Krishna Kumar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:10664 WP No. 5619 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO. 5619 OF 2026 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. SMT.THIMMAMMA WIFE OF LATE H C RANGAIAH AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS 2. SMT. R VIJAYALAKSHMI WIFE OF SRI. K CHANNAPPA AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS 3. SMT. R MANJULA WIFE OF SRI.KRISHNEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS 4. SRI. RAVIKUMAR HR SON OF LATE H C RANGAIAH AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS 5. SRI. R SHIVAKUMAR SON OF LATE H C RANGAIAH AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS ALL ARE RESIDING AT URKEHALLI VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI TALUK TUMKUR DISTRICT 572 130. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. AKKIMANJUNATH GOWDA K, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI D RAMANNA SON OF LATE DODDARANGAIAH AGED ABOUT 81 YEARS Digitally signed by CHANDANA B M Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:10664 WP No. 5619 of 2026 2. SMT. GANGALAKSHMAMMA WIFE OF LATE D GANGANNA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS 3. SRI. LOKESH SON OF LATE D GANGANNA AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS 4. SRI. UMESH SON OF LATE D GANGANNA AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS 5. SRI. MAGADI RANGAIAH SON OF LATE THIRUMALAIAH AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS 6. SMT. JAYALAKSHMAMMA WIFE OF LATE MUDDEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS 7. SMT. U M SUMITHRA DAUGHTER OF LATE MUDDEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS 8. SMT U M SUDHA DAUGHTER OF LATE MUDDEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS 9. SRI. T GANGANNA SON OF LATE THIRUMALAIAH AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS 10. SRI. RANGASWAMY SON OF SRI.GANGAIAH AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS 11. SRI. GANGAIAH SON OF LATE HUCCHALAKKAIAH AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS ALL ARE RESIDING AT URKEHALLI VILLAGE KASABAHOBLI, KUNIGAL TALUK TUMKUR DISTRICT – 572 130. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:10664 WP No. 5619 of 2026 12. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KUNIGAL POLICE STATION KUNIGAL-572 130. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. HEMALATHA.V, AGA FOR R-12 VIDE ORDER DATED: 20.02.2026, NOTICE TO R-1 TO R-11 IS D/W) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUITON OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS IN OS NO.21/2022 ON THE FILE OF THE PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KUNIGAL AND ALLOW THE IA NO.17 VIDE ANNEXURE-C, DIRECTING THE JURISDICTIONAL POLICE THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KUNIGAL POLICE STATION, KUNIGAL, RESPONDENT NO.12, TO GIVE POLICE PROTECTION TO IMPLEMENT THE INTERIM ORDER DT 10-01-2022, CONFIRMED BY THIS HONBLE COURT IN WP NO.921/2026 ON 13-01-2026, IN RESPECT OF SCHEDULE I PROPERTY. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR ORAL ORDER In this petition, petitioners seek for the following reliefs:- “ 1) Call for records in OS No.21/2022 on the file of the Prl. Civil Judge & JMFC, Kunigal and allow the I.A.No.17 vide Annexure-C, directing the jurisdictional police – the Circle Inspector of Police , Kunigal Police Station, Kunigal, Respondent No.12, to give police protection to implement the interim order dt: 10.01.2022, vide Annexure-A confirmed by this Hon’ble court in WP No.921/2026 on 13.01.2026, vide Annexure-F in respect of Schedule I Property; - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:10664 WP No. 5619 of 2026 2. Grant such other Order or relief as this Hon’ble Court deems fit to grant in the facts and circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice and equity.” 2. After arguing the matter for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the petition may be disposed of directing the trial court to pass appropriate orders on the application I.A.No.17 filed by the petitioners in the suit in O.S.No.21/2022, which is posted on 24.02.2026 as expeditiously as possible. The said submission is placed on record. 3. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of directing the trial court to dispose of I.A.No.17 filed by the petitioner for police protection within a period of two weeks from 24.02.2026. Sd/- (S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE Srl.