Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12270 (MAD)

G.Syed Hussain v. State Rep.by, The Inspector of Police

CRL RC/573/2026 · 2026-03-06

C Kumarappan

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL RC No. 573 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 06-03-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN CRL RC No. 573 of 2026 G.Syed Hussain ..Petitioner Vs State Rep.by, The Inspector of Police, J1, Ambur Police Station, Ambur, Tirupattur District. ..Respondent Prayer: Criminal Revision filed under section 438 and 442 of BNSS to call for the records in Crl.M.P.No.4 of 2026 on the file of the learned Additional District cum Judicial Magistrate at Ambur, Tirupattur District and Set aside the order dated 10.02.2026. For Petitioner: Mr.S.Madhusudanan For Respondent: Mr.R.Kishore Kumar Government Advocate (Crl.Side) ORDER This Criminal Revision has been filed to call for the records in Crl.M.P.No.4 of 2026 on the file of the learned Additional District cum Judicial Magistrate at Ambur, Tirupattur District and to set aside the order dated 10.02.2026. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL RC No. 573 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner vehemently submitted that there are allegations in the complaint and therefore the order of dismissal passed by the learned Additional District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Ambur in Crl.MP.No.4 of 2026 vide order dated 10.02.2026 is incorrect. 3. I have given my anxious consideration to either side submissions and perused the materials available on record. 4. I have also gone through the complaint dated 18.09.2024. Though there are certain allegations in respect of some criminal act, the very tenor of the complaint is only focusing on money transaction and it appears that some other self-serving allegations also had been made by the petitioner. This factum was rightly appreciated by the learned Additional District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Ambur and has given a finding that only for recovery of money, this complaint has been given. In such view of the position, this Court absolutely do not find any perversity in the order passed by the learned Additional District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Ambur. Hence, this Criminal Revision is dismissed. 06-03-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No SHL https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL RC No. 573 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 To 1. The Additional District cum Judicial Magistrate at Ambur, Tirupattur District 2. The Inspector of Police, J1, Ambur Police Station, Ambur, Tirupattur District. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL RC No. 573 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 C.KUMARAPPAN J. SHL CRL RC No. 573 of 2026 06-03-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis