Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12270 (HP)

NAND LAL v. NEERAJ GUPTA

COPC/753/2026 · 2026-06-19

Sushil Kukreja

Contempt Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:HHC:23172 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA Contempt Petition No.753 of 2026 Date of decision: 19.06.2026 Nand Lal ….Petitioner Versus Neeraj Gupta ….Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, J. Whether approved for reporting ?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Bonit Thakur,Advocate vice Mr. A.K. Gupta, Advocate. For the Respondent: Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General. Sushil Kukreja, Judge(Oral): Learned Additional Advocate General, has placed on record communication dated 18.06.2026 along with copy of office order dated 03.06.2026, wherein, it has been stated that in compliance to judgment dated 26.02.2026, passed in CWP No.1763 of 2023, the Executive Engineer, Jal Shakti Division, Nalagarh, has considered the case of the petitioner and has passed a detailed speaking consideration order vide office dated dated 03.06.2026. 2. Therefore, in view of the above, as the judgment under reference has been duly complied with, no further order is required to be passed in the present contempt petition and accordingly, the same 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2 ( 2026:HHC:23172 ) is closed and disposed of. However, the petitioner is at liberty to assail the aforesaid office order dated 03.06.2026, if he still remains aggrieved. ( Sushil Kukreja ) Judge June 19, 2026 (reena)