Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12265 (JHR)

SHARWAN YADAV @ SHRWAN KUMAR v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./2315/2026 · 2026-05-08

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B. A. No. 2315 of 2026 1. Sharwan Yadav @ Shrwan Kumar, aged about 31 years, son of Supinder Yadav 2. Mukesh Yadav @ Mukesh Kumar Yadav, aged about 30 years, son of Mahesh Yadav Both are residents of Baramuri Khatal, P.O. B. Polytechnic, P.S. Saraidhela, District-Dhanbad. ...... … Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .…. … Opposite Party -------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioners :Mr. Pratiush Lala, Advocate For the State : Mr. Pankaj Kr. Mishra, A.P.P. 06/ 08.05.2026: Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. 2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Dhanbad P.S. Case No. 417 of 2025, registered under sections 190, 191(2), 132, 121(1), 324 (3), 351(2), 352 of BNS, 2023, pending in the Court of learned C.J.M, Dhanbad. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that on the basis of order passed in W.P.(C) No. 6771 of 2025 it is alleged that informant again measured the land however, the petitioners and others obstructed for the same. He next submits that the petitioners have nothing to do with the said allegation. He next submits that false allegation has been made against the petitioners and petitioners have got no criminal antecedent which is disclosed in para 16 of the petition. On these grounds, he submits that the petitioners may kindly be provided privilege of anticipatory bail. 4. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer and submits that petitioners are named in F.I.R. 5. Considering that in W.P.(C) No. 6771 of 2025 petitioner is Vishwanath Sharma and not this petitioner and it has been stated that informant has again measured the land pursuant to that petitioners and others have obstructed the informant. In the order passed in the said writ petition there is only direction to the informant to make online entry. Further the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent which is disclosed in para 16 of the petition, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the above named, petitioners are directed to surrender before the learned court within three weeks from today and in the event of their surrender / arrest, the petitioners shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Dhanbad P.S. Case No. 417 of 2025, in connection with C.J.M, Dhanbad, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of B.N.S.S, 2023. Dt.08.05.2026 ( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) satyarthi-