Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2026:CGHC:4012
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 11953 of 2025
1. Annu Chauhan W/o Ashok Chauhan Aged About 47 Years R/o Shikshak Nagar, Ward No.7, Dhamdha, Durg District Durg, Chhattisgarh
... Petitioner versus
1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department of School Education, Atal Nagar, Mantralaya New Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.)
2. Joint Director Education Division Durg District Durg (CG)
3. Collector Durg District Durg Chhattisgarh
4. District Education Officer Durg District Durg Chhattisgarh
5. District Education Officer Rajnandgaon District Rajnandgaon (CG)
6. Vishnu Prasad Mali Working As Teacher At Govt. Girls Upper Primary School Dhamdha, District Durg Chhattisgarh
... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Mr. Shashi Kumar Kushwaha, Advocate For Respondent No.1 to 5 : Mr. Love Sharma,Panel Lawyer SB: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Parth Prateem Sahu Order on Board 22/01/2026
1. Petitioner has filed this petition seeking following reliefs:- SYED ROSHAN ZAMIR ALI Digitally signed by SYED ROSHAN ZAMIR ALI Date: 2026.01.27 11:11:30 +0530
2
“i. That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to consider the
representation and to relieve the private respondent no.6 for compliance of the transfer order dated 12.07.2022 and also direction may be issued to take disciplinary action against the responsible officer at the earliest, in the interest of justice. ii. Any other relief which may be suitable in the facts and circumstances of the case, may also be granted.”
2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that grievance raised by petitioner in this writ petition is with regard to his posting to some other school under the rationalization scheme against which he has already submitted representation before the Divisional Level Committee, which is pending consideration, therefore, a direction be issued to the Divisional Level Committee to take decision on petitioner’s representation at the earliest within specified time. 3. Learned State Counsel submits that if claim of petitioner is with regard to decision on his representation, he is having no objection to such limited prayer. 4. Heard learned counsel for parties and perused documents available in record of writ petition. 3
5.
On due consideration of submission of learned counsel for respective parties, this writ petition is disposed of at this stage with a direction to the Divisional Level Committee to take decision on petitioner’s pending representation (Annexure P-5 to writ petition) in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the order. 6. Certified copy as per rules. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge roshan/