Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12256 (JHR)

DHARMESHWAR ORAON v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./3641/2026 · 2026-05-11

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:14217] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.3641 of 2026 ------ Dharmeshwar Oraon aged about 19 Years S/O Late Sohrai Oraon R/O Village- Teliya Raidih, P.O. & P.S.- Raidih District- Gumla (Jharkhand) .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Kripa Shankar Nanda, Advocate For the State : Mr. Arup Kr. Dey, Addl.P.P. ------ Order No:-03 Dated:-11-05-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Mufassil P.S. Case No. 26 of 2025 corresponding to G.R. Case No. 31 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 310(2), 311 of the B.N.S., 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner committed dacoity and looted Rs.3,50,000/- and mobile phone. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is also submitted that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. and without putting him under T.I. Parade, charge sheet has been submitted against him. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 16.10.2025 as is evident from para-1 of the instant bail application. It is next submitted that the co-accused, with similar allegations, has already been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 22.04.2026 passed in B.A. 3229 of 2026. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Simdega in connection with Mufassil P.S. Case No. 26 of 2025 corresponding to G.R. Case No. 31 of 2026 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 11.05.2026 Saroj/