CRL.M.C. 4946/2026 1 $~71 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 17th July, 2026 + CRL.M.C. 4946/2026 & CRL.M.A. 20731/2026 SUMIT KUMAR AND ANR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. L.P. Singh, Mr. Anil Kumar, Ms. Kanika Bhatia and Mr. Dinesh Kumar, Advocates for Petitioner No.1 & 2. versus THE STATE (GNCT OF DELHI) AND ANR. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Rajkumar, APP for the State with ASI Omparkash. Mr. Pawan Kumar Saxena, Advocate for R-2 alongwith respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral) 1. Petitioners herein seek quashing of FIR No. 62/2023 dated 12.08.2023, registered at Police Station Crime (Women) Cell, Nanak Pura, for commission of offences under Sections 498A/34 IPC, along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. 2. The marriage between complainant (respondent No.2 herein) and petitioner No.1 was solemnized on 26.09.2022, as per Hindu rites and customs. No child is born from the abovesaid wedlock. 3. However, on account of temperamental differences, the parties started residing separately and when a complaint was lodged by respondent No.2, it Signed By:SONIA THAPLIYAL Signing Date:20.07.2026 11:58:33 Signature Not Verified CRL.M.C. 4946/2026 2 resulted into registration of the abovesaid FIR. 4. Charge-sheet has already been filed. 5. However, when the matter was referred to mediation, the parties were able to amicably resolve the matter under the aegis of Delhi Mediation Centre, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi on 13.03.2026. 6. It is in the abovesaid backdrop that quashing is being sought. 7. Respondent no. 2 is present in person and she has been duly identified by her counsel as well as by Investigating Officer. 8. When asked, respondent No. 2 reiterates the terms of abovesaid settlement. She also submits that there is already a divorce between them by way of mutual consent on 06.05.2026. She states that she has agreed to accept a total sum of Rs. 6,50,000/- as full and final settlement in lieu of istridhan, alimony, maintenance for self (past, present and future). She submits that she has already received Rs.4,50,000/- and the balance amount of Rs. 2,00,000/- has been received today in the shape of Demand Draft drawn on Indian Bank. She states that she has entered into the abovesaid settlement out of her own free will, without any coercion and influence from any corner whatsoever and therefore, she would have ‘no objection’ if FIR in question is quashed. 9. In view of the settlement arrived at between the parties, continuing with criminal proceedings would serve no useful purpose, especially, when dispute does not involve any public interest and is, primarily, private in nature. In any case, even the complainant does not wish to press any charges against the petitioners. 10. Accordingly, exercising inherent powers vested in this Court under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, it is deemed Signed By:SONIA THAPLIYAL Signing Date:20.07.2026 11:58:33 CRL.M.C. 4946/2026 3 appropriate to quash the instant FIR. 11. Consequently, to secure the ends of justice, FIR No. 62/2023 dated 12.08.2023, registered at Police Station Crime (Women) Cell, Nanak Pura, for commission of offences under Sections 498A/34 IPC, along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, is, hereby, quashed. 12. Original affidavits, copies of which have been placed on record in the present proceedings, be submitted before the learned Trial Court within four weeks from today. 13. The petition stands disposed of in aforesaid terms. 14. The pending application also stands disposed of. (MANOJ JAIN) JUDGE JULY 17, 2026/ss/sk Signed By:SONIA THAPLIYAL Signing Date:20.07.2026 11:58:33