Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12256 (BOM)

MUKUNDA VISHNU SURALKAR v. MRS RUPALI MUKUNDA SURALKAR

APPR/181/2026 · 2026-09-24

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 19-appr-181-26.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APPR) NO. 181 OF 2026 IN CRIMINAL REVISION STAMP NO. 7816 OF 2026 Mukunda Vishnu Suralkar Versus Mrs. Rupali Mukunda Suralkar Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Order Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's order Ms. Vrushali S. Mohod Appointed Advocate for the applicant. CORAM : MEHROZ K. PATHAN, J. DATED : 24th SEPTEMBER, 2026. This is an application for condonation of delay of 36 days in filing the revision application. 2. Ms. Mohod, learned counsel for the applicant submits that the delay is neither intentional nor deliberate but has occurred due to inadvertence and for the reasons that the applicant was occupied in the agricultural operation, therefore, the applicant could not take steps for filing the revision application within limitation. The delay caused is not intentional and hence the same may be condoned. SKNair 2026:BHC-NAG:12935 2 19-appr-181-26.odt 3. The notice was issued on delay condonation application, however, the non-applicant was not found on the given address. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor was also directed to intimate the non-applicant about the pendency of the revision application which was pending for consideration delay condonation challenging the order of maintenance in the revision application. 4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has also placed on record the communication dated 17.04.2026 whereby it was informed that the attempt was made by the police station officer to serve the non- applicant, however, the non-applicant could not be found on the given address. The communication is taken on record and marked as ‘X’ for the purpose of identification. 5. For the reasons stated in the application, the delay of 36 days in filing the revision application is hereby condoned. The application is allowed and disposed of accordingly. 6. The quantify fees be paid to Ms. Mohod, appointed Advocate as per the Rules. [MEHROZ K. PATHAN, J.] SKNair Signed by: Mr. S.K. NAIR Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 30/09/2026 12:02:32