$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 1027/2026 PRAMOD .....Petitioner Through: Mr.Vishwajeet Kumar, Mr.Rakesh Kumar and Mr.Kumar Amit Singh, Advocates. versus STATE OF NCT DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Shoaib Haider, APP for State with SI Arpita Mishra PS Vijay vihar CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV O R D E R % 20.07.2026 1. The instant application has been filed on behalf of the applicant under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (erstwhile Section 439 of Cr.P.C) seeking grant of regular bail in relation to FIR No.622/2025 registered at PS Vijay Vihar qua the offence punishable under Section 64(2)(m)/ 79/ 351 of BNS. 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the instant case. According to him, the applicant was the tenant of the prosecutrix and he had earlier given some money to the prosecutrix and when he sought for recovery of the same, a false complaint was filed. He submits that the applicant is in jail since 11.12.2025. The investigation is completed and the charge sheet has been filed. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 21/07/2026 at 12:00:41 3. Submissions made on behalf of the applicant are vehemently opposed by learned APP for the State as well as by the prosecutrix, who has joined the proceedings through video conferencing. They submit that bearing in mind the seriousness of the allegations, the applicant is not entitled for grant of regular bail. 4. I have considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and also perused the record. 5. It remains undisputed that after registration of the FIR, the investigation is completed, the charge sheet has been filed, charges have been framed and the matter is now pending for trial. The evidence has not yet commenced and the trial will take sufficient time in its completion. There is no other criminal case pending against the present applicant. It also remains undisputed that the applicant was the tenant of the prosecutrix and from the charge sheet, it also appears that there was some money given by the applicant to the prosecutrix, which as per the prosecutrix was returned to him. The applicant and the prosecutrix both are married. The prosecutrix has two major children. 6. The prosecutrix, who has joined the proceedings through video conferencing submits that the applicant shall not create any problem to her family members. 7. Bearing in mind the overall facts and circumstances, the applicant is directed to be released on regular bail on such conditions as may be imposed by the concerned Trial Court. 8. Liberty is, however, granted to the prosecutrix to file an application seeking cancellation of bail, in case, the applicant in any manner influences the prosecution evidence or causes any harassment to the prosecutrix. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 21/07/2026 at 12:00:41 9. Nothing stated hereinabove shall however be construed as an expression of opinion on merits of the case. 10. The application stands disposed of. 11. Copy of the order be forwarded to the concerned Jail Superintendent for necessary compliance. PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J JULY 20, 2026 Nc This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 21/07/2026 at 12:00:41