APHC010094512022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3604] TUESDAY, THE 6th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM WRIT PETITION NO: 5722/2022 Between: 1. PASUPULETI GOPAL, PASUPULETI GOPAL, S/O VENKATASWAMI, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, OCC FARMER, RIO GOPALAKRISHNAPURAM VILLAGE, H/O MUDUMPADU, T.SUNDUPALLI MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT, VELGAPUDI AMARAVATHI GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KADAPA, KADAPA DISTRICT. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, T.SUNDUPALLI, T.SUNDUPALLI MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT. 4. KAVALI SUBBARAMAIAH, S/O VENKATASWAMI AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, RIO GOPALAKRISHNAPURAM VILLAGE, H/O MUDUMPADU, T.SUNDUPALLI MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT- 516129 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toFor the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, it is hereby prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents particularly the 3rd respondent in threatening the petitioner 2 with dire consequences and compelling for settlement of Rs1,00,000/- (Rupees one lakh) to the 4th respondent and further threatening to implicate in criminal cases if not settle, even the petitioner requesting time for repayment of amount is arbitrary illegal and against to the provisions of Article 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to call for the petitioner to the Police Station and to sit entire day for settling the amount and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Respondentis For the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the above Writ Petition it is hereby prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction to the respondents not to call for the petitioner to the Police Station and to sit him entire day for settlement of Rs: 100,000/- (Rupees one lakh) to the 4th respondent and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. S ACHI BABU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM WRIT PETITION NO: 5722/2022 ORDER: 1. No representation on behalf of the petitioner. On 22.03.2022 and 16.09.2026, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It shows that the petitioner has no interest to prosecute the petition. 2. In the result, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. ___________________ SUNITHA GANDHAM,J Date: 06.10.2026 SSA 4 08 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM WRIT PETITION NO: 5722/2022 Date: 06.10.2026 SSA