HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 16629 of 2026 Court No. - 33 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for State-respondents and perused the record. 2. The present petition has been filed challenging the order dated 05.08.2026 passed by respondent no. 4, situated at Jammu & Kashmir. 3. Learned Central Government Counsel has raised a preliminary objection that this Court has no territorial jurisdiction as the authorities are at Jammu and Kashmir. He further submitted that the petitioner can avail remedy before the Armed Forces Tribunal. 4. Since the petitioner has an alternative remedy, I am not inclined to entertain the instant petition. 5. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to avail the remedy as available to him under law. October 8, 2026 Ved Prakash Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mohammad Danish, Shariq Shamim Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I. (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Sameer Husain .....Petitioner(s) Union Of India And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad