Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12246 (AP)

Chenumuri Srinivasulu v. State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/9009/2021 · 2026-10-05

Sunitha Gandham

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010155432021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3604] TUESDAY, THE 6th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM WRIT PETITION NO: 9009/2021 Between: 1. CHENUMURI SRINIVASULU, S/O RAMANAIAH, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, OCC.AGRICULTURE COOLIE, R/O KANCHARAPALEM VILLAGE, H/O UTUKURU VILLAGE, VIDAVALURU MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 2. CHENUMURI ANAND, S/O RAMANAIAH, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, OCC.AGRICULTURE COOLIE, R/O KANCHARAPALEM VILLAGE, H/O UTUKURU VILLAGE, VIDAVALURU MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 3. PALEPU SHASHIDHAR, S/O PARTHASARATHI, AGED ABOUT 48YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE COOLIE, R/O UTUKURU VILLAGE, VIDAVALURU MANDAL, SPSR NELLROE DISTRCIT. 4. SURISETTY ARUNA, W/O NAGESWARRAO, AGED ABOUT 50YEARS, R/O UTUKURU VILLAGE, VIDAVALURU MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTIRCT. 5. PALLIBOINA KRISHNAMMA, W/O MASTHANAIAH, AGED ABOUT 40YEARS, OCC.COOLIE, R/O UTUKURU VILLAGE, VIDAVALURU MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTIRCT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT,ANDHRAPRADESH, AMARAVATI 2 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NELLORE RURAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 4. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KOVVUR CIRCLE,KOVVUR, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 5. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VIDAVALURU POLICE STATION, VIDA.VALURU MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 6. B MAHINDRA, THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VIDAVALURU POLICE STATION, VIDAVALURU MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents more particularly respondent no. 5 in interfering with the peacefull life's and libertie's of the petitioners as illegal,arbitrary and article 14 and 21 of constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere in the life's and liberties of the petitioners and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to interfere in respect of the peacefull life's and libertie's of the petitioners,pending disposal of the writ petition, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. P NARASIMHULU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM WRIT PETITION NO: 9009/2021 ORDER: 1. Sri P. Narasimhulu, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that they do not have any instructions and as such this matter may be dismissed. 2. Recorded the said submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioners. 3. In the result, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. ___________________ SUNITHA GANDHAM,J Date: 06.10.2026 SSA 4 05 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM WRIT PETITION NO: 9009/2021 Date: 06.10.2026 SSA