APHC010491542013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE 28th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 16783 OF 2013 Between: 1. TR, SRI PARAMESWARI BINNY MODERN RICE MILL, ANANTAPUR DT, Dharmavaram, Anantapur District, Rep by its Partner, G.Balakrishna Reddy ...Petitioner AND 1. SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER OPN APCPDCL ANANTAPUR DIST 2, A.P.C.P.D.C.L., Anantapur, Anantapur District. 2. The Divisional Electrical Engineer Operation, A.P.C.P.D.C.L., Anantapur, Anantapur District. 3. The Assistant Divisional Engineer Operation, A.P.C.P.D.C.L., Dharmavaram, Anantapur District. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more in the nature of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in issuing impugned Proceedings No. DEE/ 0/ ATP/ Comml. / F.Back Billing/ D.No. 98/13, Dt.22.04.2013 by finally assessing the Back Billing from 10.06.2009 to 28.06.2012 to the petitioner Service Connection bearing No. 0201031845, as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and contrary to condition No.7.5.1.4.4 of 2 General Terms and Conditions of Supply and consequently set aside the aforesaid impugned proceedings IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 20361 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to take any coerc(ve steps including disconnection of power supply to the petitioner Service Connection bearing No. 0201031845 by suspending the operation of impugned Final Assessment Proceedings No . DEE / 0/ ATP/ Comml. / F.Back Billing/ D.No. 98/13, Dt.22.04.2013 issued by the 2nd respondent, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to vacate the Interim order, dated 14.06.2013 made in W.P.No. 16783 of 2013 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: K RATHANGA PANI REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: Venkata Rama Rao Kota SC FOR APSPDCL Counsel for the Respondents:N SIVA REDDY(SC FOR APTRANSCO) The Court made the following order: 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 16783 OF 2013 ORDER: Heard Sri Shiva Teja Reddy, learned counsel representing the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents. 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri Shiva Teja Reddy, learned counsel representing the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the present Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication and the matter becomes infructuous. 3. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. __________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 28.09.2026 BSP 4 46 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 16783 OF 2013 28.09.2026 BSP