Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2026:CGHC:5976
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 4306 of 2019 Sanjay Kumar Sahu S/o Shri Panna Lal Sahu Aged About 31 Years Presently Posted As Assistant Sub Inspector, Office Of Superintendent Of Police, Durg, District Durg Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh
... Petitioner Versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through Principal Secretary, Home Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Director General Of Police Police Headquarter, Mahanadi Bhawan, Police Station Rakhi, Atal Nagar Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Inspector General Of Police Office 32 Bunglow, Bhilai, District Durg Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh 4 - Superintendent Of Police Durg, District Durg Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh
... Respondent [Cause-title taken from Case Information System (CIS)] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Petitioner
: Mr. Tapan Kumar Chandra, Advocate For Respondents-State : Mr. Rahul Tamaskar, Govt. Advocate ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Single Bench: Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal (Order on Board) 03.02.2026
1. In this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged order dated 29.05.2019 (Annexure-P/18), passed by the respondent No.04, by which, direction has been issued to the Addl. Superintendent of Police, Durg to complete the departmental enquiry (DE) pending against the petitioner. SAIFAN KHAN Digitally signed by SAIFAN KHAN
2
2. Learned State counsel, upon instructions, submits that the departmental enquiry in question has already been concluded and punishment order has also been issued against the petitioner.
3. In view of aforesaid submission, no cause of action survives to be adjudication in this petition. Accordingly, this petition stands disposed of. However, liberty is reserved in favour of the petitioner to challenge the order of punishment, if he wishes to do so.
Sd/-
(Sanjay K. Agrawal)
Judge s@if