Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12233 (JHR)

SMT. RAMPATI DEVI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

WPC/3333/2026 · 2026-05-13

Sri Ananda Sen

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:14550 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI WP(C) No.3333 of 2026 ----- Smt. Rampati Devi, aged about 72 years, wife of Bhuneshwar Prasad Jaiswal, resident of In front of Arihant Hospital, Mission Chowk, Ring Road, Ambikapur, P.O. & P.S. Ambikapur, District Sarguja (Chhattisgarh), at present residing at Village Masihani, P.O. & P.S. Chhattarpur, District Palamau, through her Notarised Power of Attorney Holder namely Bhuneshwar Prasad Jaiswal bearing Deed No. 18968 dated 9.3.2022, son of Late Ram Awtar Jaiswal, aged about 79 years, resident of in front of Arihant Hospital, Mission Chowk, Ring Road, Ambikapur, P.O. & P.S. Ambikapur, District Sarguja (Chhattisgarh). … Petitioner(s). Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Deputy Commissioner-cum-District Magistrate, Palamau, P.O. & P.S. Medininagar, District Palamau. 3. Competent Officer-cum-District Land Acquisition Officer, Palamau, P.O. & P.S. Medininagar, District - Palamau. 4. Circle Officer, Chhattarpur, P.O. & P.S. Chhattarpur, District - Palamau. 5. Project Director, National Highway Authority of India, Medininagar, P.O. & P.S. Medininagar, District Palamau. … Respondent(s). CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Ranjan Kumar, AC to Sr. SC-I For the NHAI : Mrs. Sweety Topno, Advocate Mr. Amrit Raj Kisku, Advocate …...... 03 /13.05.2026: Heard the learned counsel representing the petitioner and the learned counsel representing the respondents. 2. The petitioner prays that the awarded amount of Rs. 14,55,351/- which has been assessed as compensation in lieu of the acquisition of the land appertaining to Khata No. 42, Plot No. 181/4, area 0.112 acres acquired under the National Highways Act be disbursed to the petitioner. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits after receipt of the notice the petitioner appeared before the authorities and deposited all the documents but the respondents have not 2026:JHHC:14550 2 disbursed the amount to the petitioner. He submits that the petitioner has also filed the representation before the authorities. 4. Considering the submission of the petitioner, I direct the District Land Acquisition Officer, Palamau-respondent no.3 to look into the grievance of the petitioner and ensure disbursement of the compensation amount to the awardees, if there are no other impediments. 5. If there are no other impediments and the petitioner is actual awardee, the amount should be disbursed within six weeks from the date of receipt of the copy of this order. 6. If there is some legal impediment for which the awarded amount could not be disbursed to the petitioner, the reasons thereof should communicate be to the petitioner within the aforesaid period. 7. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of. (ANANDA SEN, J.) 13.05.2026 Tanuj/CP-2 Uploaded on 15.05.2026