PRITAM KUMAR CHOUDHARY ALIAS MEGHA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./3779/2026 · 2026-05-07
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 12231 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 12231 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:JHHC:13703] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.3779 of 2026
------ Pritam Kumar Choudhary @ Megha, Aged about 27 years, S/O- Kishori Choudhary, R/O- Sakrogadh, Gas Godam, P.O.- Sahibganj, P.S.- Jirwabari, District- Sahibganj.
.... .... …. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Deepak Sahu, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Rakesh Ranjan, Addl.P.P
------
Order No.02 Dated- 07-05-2026
Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection Sahibganj Nagar P.S. Case No.189 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 109(1), 351(3), 352, 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner in furtherance of common intention with the accused persons attempted to commit murder by firing upon the daughter of the informant, but the bullet missed the target and when the informant went inside her house, the petitioner started firing at her house and they smashed the glass panel of an e-rickshaw parked outside the house of the informant, they also kicked the door due to which doors’ top panel broke and also broke the back window of the house of the informant. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is next submitted that the petitioner has not been named in the F.I.R. and the petitioner has only been implicated in this case only on the basis of confessional statement of the co-accused person. It is further submitted that no one has sustained any injury. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 28.02.2026
as mentioned in para-01 of instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl. P.P. appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is
directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Sahibganj in connection with Sahibganj Nagar P.S. Case No.189 of 2025 with the condition that they will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish their mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that they will not change their mobile number during the trial of the case in any manner, during trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 07/05/2026 Amar/