RAJEEV KUMAR SHARMA AND ANOTHER v. ASHISH KUMAR KOHLI
COPC/630/2026 · 2026-06-18
Sushil Kukreja
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 12224 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 12224 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 ( 2026:HHC:22875 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No.630 of 2026 Date of Decision: 18.06.2026 ___________________________________________________ Rajeev Kumar Sharma & another ....Petitioners Versus Ashish Kumar Kohli …Respondent ___________________________________________________ Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 ________________________________________________ For the petitioners : Ms. Parul Negi, Advocate. For the respondent : Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General. ________________________________________________ Sushil Kukreja, Judge (Oral) Learned Additional Advocate General has placed on record copy of office order dated 16.06.2026, wherein it has been stated that the petitioners (who are initially appointed as TGT on contract basis) are allowed higher pay scale of Rs.41,600/- after two years of regular service, subject to the final outcome of LPA filed in CWP No.4830/2023 and any other legal remedies. 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2 ( 2026:HHC:22875 )
2. Therefore, in this view of the matter, no further
order is required to be passed in the present petition and the same is disposed of accordingly.
3. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioners to assail the office order dated 16.06.2026, in accordance with law, if they are still aggrieved. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand
disposed of. ( Sushil Kukreja ) June 18, 2026 Judge (V. Himalvi)