HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 21598 of 2026 Court No. - 36 HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for State. 2. The petitioner has claimed that a boundary wall situated on his land has been demolished by State Authorities, however, said allegation is denied by learned Standing Counsel on instructions. 3. Therefore, this dispute within the realm of disputed fact cannot be decided in writ jurisdiction. Otherwise, petitioner has a liberty to take alternative remedy available under U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 or any other remedy. 4. With aforesaid liberty, this writ petition is disposed of. 5. It is made clear that this Court has not entered into merit of case, therefore, all issues on facts as well as on law are kept open. October 8, 2026 N. Sinha Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Jamil Ahamad Azmi, Mohd Umar Farooq Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.) Sampat Yadav .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 7 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NIRMAL SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad