Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12220 (JHR)

AMRENDRA SINGH ALIAS GUDDU SINGH ALIAS AMRANDER SINGH v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./3918/2026 · 2026-05-08

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

(2026:JHHC:14169) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 3918 of 2026 Amrendra Singh @ Guddu Singh @ Amrander Singh, aged about 45 years, son of Tarkeshwar Singh, resident of Anugrah Nagar, Dhansar, PO & PS – Dhansar, District- Dhanbad, Jharkhand. … … …Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand. … … …Opp. Party ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Bibhash Sinha, Advocate For the State : Mr. Sunil Kr. Dubey, Addl. P.P. ------ HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ Order No:- 03, Dated:- 08th May, 2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with S.T. Case No. 239 of 2026, arising out of Jharia P.S. Case No. 232 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under 109, 103, 61 of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner has committed the murder of Bhim Mandal @ Budhan Mandal. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is next submitted that during the trial, the informant has been examined as P.W.1 and the father of the informant has been examined as P.W.2 and the P.W.1 has identified the petitioner but he has categorically stated that he does not know who fired upon Bhim Mandal and the P.W.2 has also stated that he also does not know who fired upon Bhim Mandal and in para-8, the P.W.2 has stated that on being enquired by him, the deceased while he was alive told that it was night hence, he could not see who fired upon him. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant or witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 24.03.2026 as mentioned inpara-11 of the instant bail application. It is lastly submitted that the co-accused person of similar allegation has already been granted bail by this Court on 16.07.2025 passed in B.A. No. 5886 of 2025. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge – I, Dhanbad, in connection with S.T. Case No. 239 of 2026, arising out of Jharia P.S. Case No. 232 of 2024, with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case, furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant or witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated – 08.05.2026 Aditi