1 2026:CGHC:4485 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRC No. 881 of 2026 1 - Satyendra Singh S/o Sube Singh Aged About 18 Years (Wrongly Mentioned As Satendra In The First Bail Rejection Order Of Honble Court), R/o Ramnagar, P.S.- Vishrampur, District- Surajpur C.G. 2 - Sube Singh S/o Ram Singh Aged About 40 Years R/o Village Ramnagar, P.S.- Vishrampur, District- Surajpur C.G. ... Applicants versus State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Station- Vishrampur, District- Surajpur C.G. --- Respondent For Applicants : Mr. Gautam Khetrapal, Advocate with Mr. Rudra Prataph Dubey, Advocate. For Respondent/State : Mr. Rishi Raj Pithawan, PL. Hon'ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma Order on Board 27/01/2026 1. This is the Third Bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Shuraksha Sanhita for grant of regular bail to the applicants who have been arrested in connection with Crime No.232/2024, registered at Police Station -Vishrampur, District- Surajpur C.G, for the offence punishable under Sections 103(1), 3(5) of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. 2 2. First bail application was dismissed on merits by this Court, however, second bail application wad dismissed as withdrawn. 3. Case of prosecution, in brief, is that on 18.10.2024, complainant namely Ramdhar Singh lodged Merg Intimation before the police Station Vishrampur, stating that main accused Mahendra Singh alongwith co-accused/present applicants have assaulted and committed murder by pushing the deceased Puja Singh into a well. Based upon which, FIR was registered against the accused persons for the alleged crime/offence. 4. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that this third bail application is filed in change circumstances, therefore, the applicants may be enlarged on bail. 5. Learned State Counsel opposes the submission of counsel for the applicants and submits that as per case diary, on the date of alleged incident, present applicants alongwith co-accused Mahendra Singh have assaulted and committed murder by pushing the deceased Puja Singh into a well. 6. Heard learned counsel for parties. 7. Considering facts of the case, nature of allegation, submissions of counsel for the parties, particularly the fact that first bail application of applicant was dismissed on merits and there is no new grounds reflected/pleaded in the instant bail application, hence, I do not find any substantial change in circumstances to admit this bail application. 3 8. Accordingly, the third bail application is dismissed. However, looking to the detention period of the applicants, ie ,since 19.10.2024, trial Court concerned is directed to expedite the trial, expeditiously as soon as possible, if there is no any legal impediment. CC as per rules. Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) Judge J/-