[2026:RJ-JP:13282] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2829/2026 Sadda Alias Saddam S/o Akup, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Gaonwadi Police Station Jurhara, Currently Resident Of Garhi Mewat Police Station Khoh, District Deeg. (At Present Accused Is Confined In District Jail Deeg). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Arafat Hussain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 30/03/2026 1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.414/2025 registered at Police Station Sikari, District Deeg for offences under Sections 303(2), 317(2) and 341(1) of BNS, 2023. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. The allegation against the present petitioner is that he committed theft of a motorcycle belonging to the complainant. Co-accused, namely Kallu @ Jamshed, Mustaq, and Hakmu @ Hakmuddeen, have already been enlarged on bail by this Hon’ble Court vide order dated 30.01.2026. It is submitted that though seven criminal cases were previously registered against the present petitioner but no case [2026:RJ-JP:13282] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-2829/2026] has been registered against him since the year 2019. Moreover, in all pending cases, the petitioner has already been granted bail. The petitioner is behind the bars since 26.11.2025. Charge-sheet has been filed. The trial of the case will take considerable time and no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, consequently, the bail application deserves to be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Sadda Alias Saddam S/o Akup, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/42