SHRI MUKESH MITTAL v. THE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH SECRETARY
W.P.(Cr.)/105/2026 · 2026-05-13
Sujit Narayan Prasad
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 12209 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 12209 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:14683 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P(Cr.) No. 105 of 2026
---------------
Shri Mukesh Mittal, aged 66 years, Son of Late Shri Babu Lal Mittal, Resident of E-265, Naraina Vihar, P.O and P.S-Naraina, New Delhi- 110028 ........ Petitioner
Versus
1. The Union of India Through Secretary, Ministry of Finance, PO & PS Sansad Marg, New Delhi
2. The Director, Directorate of Enforcement, P.O & P.S Sansad Marg, New Delhi.
3. The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Ranchi Zonal Office, Plot No.1502/B, Airport Road, Hinoo, P.O. & P.S. Hinoo, Dist. Ranchi, Jharkhand 834002.
4. HDFC Bank Limited (Through concerned Branch Manager) E-51 Naraina Vihar, P.O and P.S Naraina New Delhi-110028.
5. CANARA BANK (Through concerned Branch Manager) F-19, Connaught Circus, PO + PS-Rajiv Chowk, New Delhi-110001. ...... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD
For the Petitioner : Mr. Abhishek Kumar Dwivedi, Advocate (through VC)
Mr. Vishal Kumar Binay, Advocate For the Resp.-ED : Mr. Amit Kumar Das, Advocate
Order No.08/Dated: 13th May, 2026
1. Mr. Abhishek Kumar Dwivedi, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner who has appeared through “Virtual Mode” assisted by Mr. Vishal Kumar Binay, the learned counsel after some argument has sought for leave of this Court to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to avail the alternative remedy as available under the Statute.
2. There is no opposition by the learned counsel appearing for the respondent-ED.
3. Accordingly, this writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid and disposed of as such.
(Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.)
Dated:13.05.2026 Sudhir